Peer Review Process

 

PEER REVIEW PROCESS

Every manuscript submitted to Journal Al-Kautsar undergoes a rigorous peer review process to ensure scholarly quality and practical relevance. The journal operates a Double-Blind Peer Review policy, where the identities of both the authors and the reviewers are concealed from each other throughout the review process.
REVIEW WORKFLOW
1. Initial Screening The Editor performs an initial evaluation regarding the focus and scope, formatting, and plagiarism check (maximum similarity index of 20%).
2. Double-Blind Review The manuscript is assigned to at least two independent reviewers (experts in their respective fields) to be assessed for substance and methodology.
3. Editorial Decision Based
PEER REVIEW PROCESS

Setiap naskah yang masuk ke Journal Al-Kautsar akan melalui proses peninjauan sejawat (peer review) yang ketat untuk menjamin kualitas ilmiah dan kontribusi praktisnya. Jurnal ini menerapkan kebijakan Double-Blind Peer Review, di mana identitas penulis dan peninjau disembunyikan satu sama lain.
REVIEW WORKFLOW
1. Initial Screening Editor melakukan evaluasi awal terkait kesesuaian focus and scope, format penulisan, serta pengecekan plagiarisme (maksimal 20%).
2. Peer Review Naskah dikirimkan kepada minimal dua mitra bestari (Reviewer) yang ahli di bidangnya untuk dinilai secara substansi dan metodologi.
3. Editorial Decision Berdasarkan rekomendasi reviewer, Editor akan memutuskan apakah naskah: Accepted, Revision Required, Resubmit for Review, atau Declined.
4. Final Production Naskah yang diterima akan melalui proses copyediting dan layout sebelum diterbitkan secara resmi.
Seluruh proses komunikasi antara penulis dan reviewer dilakukan secara transparan melalui sistem Open Journal Systems (OJS).