The Role of Fatwas in Resolving Sharia Economic Disputes: An Analytical Study of Basyarnas and Religious Court Decisions

Main Article Content

Abdurrahman Saleh

Abstract

Sharia economic disputes are increasingly prevalent due to the growth of Islamic finance and the complexities of modern transactions. This study investigates the crucial role of fatwas (religious edicts) in resolving these disputes, with a specific focus on the contributions of the National Sharia Economic Board (Basyarnas) and the Religious Courts in Indonesia. The research employs a qualitative approach, analyzing relevant legal frameworks, fatwas, and court decisions to understand how fatwas influence dispute resolution. The methods include a literature review of existing scholarship, legal documents, and case studies. The findings reveal that fatwas provide essential guidance for interpreting sharia principles in economic contexts, offering alternative dispute resolution mechanisms and informing judicial decisions. Basyarnas plays a vital role in issuing fatwas that clarify complex financial issues, while the Religious Courts incorporate these fatwas to ensure sharia compliance in their rulings. The study concludes that fatwas are indispensable in maintaining the integrity of sharia economic transactions and fostering justice in the resolution of disputes. The research underscores the need for harmonization between fatwa-based guidance and positive law, advocating for a more comprehensive and consistent approach to resolving sharia economic disputes. The study emphasizes the importance of protecting consumer rights and ensuring fairness in all sharia economic transactions.

Article Details

How to Cite
Saleh, A. (2025). The Role of Fatwas in Resolving Sharia Economic Disputes: An Analytical Study of Basyarnas and Religious Court Decisions. Samarinda International Journal of Islamic Studies, 2(2). https://doi.org/10.64093/sijis.v2i2.609
Section
Articles

References

Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2018). Designing and conducting mixed methods research (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications.

Daryoko, D., Arief, A. S., & Asmuni. (2022). MORTGAGE AUCTION AT BANK SYARIAH INDONESIA EX-LEGACY BANK BNI SYARIAH IN YOGYAKARTA. Tasharruf Journal Economics and Business of Islam, 7(1), 91-106. https://doi.org/10.30984/tjebi.v7i1.1820

Esposito, J. L. (2000). Islam: The straight path (3rd ed.). Oxford University Press.

Ihsan, M. N., & Amrizal. (2023). Analysis of Sharia Pawn Dispute Resolution in Indonesia in Terms of the Concept of Maqashid Al-Syari'ah. Jurnal Multidisiplin Madani, 3(12), 9117-9124. https://doi.org/10.55927/mudima.v3i12.7087

Kasim, A. (2021). THE SETTLEMENT OF SHARIA ECONOMIC DISPUTES IN INDONESIAN ISLAMIC CLASSIC TRADITIONS AND POSITIVE LAW. Tasharruf Journal Economics and Business of Islam, 6(1), 1-16. https://doi.org/10.30984/tjebi.v6i1.1414

Kholid, M. (2019). Sharia Arbitration as an Alternative Settlement of Sharia Banking Disputes. International Journal of Nusantara Islam, 6(1), 93-106. https://doi.org/10.15575/ijni.v6i1.4043

Merry, S. E. (1988). Legal pluralism. Law & Society Review, 22(5), 869-896.

Schwartz, A. (2000). Consumer contract law: A legal and economic analysis. Journal of Legal Studies, 29(2), 511-546.

Setyowati, R., & Prabowo, B. A. (2021). Sharia Principles in the Financial Services Authority Regulation on Dispute Settlement Alternatives. Student Law Review, 5(1), 56-70. https://doi.org/10.28946/slrev.vol5.iss1.864.pp56-70

Yin, R. K. (2017). Case study research and applications: Design and methods (6th ed.). SAGE Publications.